Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Nutter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1916No. 20,153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Washington district court; JOHN C. HoGIN, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*76The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action for slander. The plaintiff recovered judgment. The defendant appeals.

The plaintiff’s petition sets out three causes of action. No evidence was introduced to support the second cause, and it was withdrawn from the consideration of the jury. The jury found in favor of the defendant on the third, and returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $100 on the first cause of action.

The slanderous words set out in the first cause of action are: “He” (meaning the plaintiff) “has been stealing chickens.” The evidence to support…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Baugh v. FistSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Ramsey v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Taylor v. Atchison Gravel, Sand & Rock Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Rogers v. Kansas Coöperative Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacKey v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Della Posta v. Rand Express Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
  3. Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API