Legal Opinion
Auerbacher v. Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 17, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
19 N.J. Super. 191 (1952)
88 A.2d 262
EMILENE L. AUERBACHER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALAN L. SMITH AND EMELIE B. SMITH, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided April 17, 1952.
Mr. George H. Rosenstein, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Carey, Schenk & Jardine (Mr. Robert Carey, Jr., appearing), attorneys for defendants.
STEIN, J.S.C.
The plaintiff is the owner of a dwelling in Orange which dwelling adjoins that of the defendants. Both homes consist of one-family houses. Both premises were component parts of a larger tract, measuring about 200 feet by 200. Plainitff's complaint for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Iselin v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Babcock v. LaidlawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Trainer v. CalefSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burlington Tp. v. Middle Dep't Inspection Agency, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Auerbacher v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Autotote Ltd. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Autotote Ltd. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981