Autotote Ltd. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentSchreiber, J.
The “strong public policy underlying the public bidding statutes,” ante at 369, with its necessary corollary that “statutory exceptions to public bidding requirements should be strictly *377construed,” ante at 370, two principles enunciated by the majority, when applied to the facts of this case, compel the conclusion that public bidding is in order here. .
The statute governing the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority provides that:... no contract on behalf of the authority shall be entered into for the doing of any work, or for the hiring of equipment or vehicles, where the sum to be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Galloway Township Board of Education v. Galloway Township Ass'n of Educational SecretariesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Gorton v. Reliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Pucillo v. Mayor and Council of Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Datatrol Inc. v. State Purchasing AgentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.