Farr v. Laidig Concrete, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Randall Farr and Ramona Farr appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Laidig Concrete, Inc.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether genuine issues of material fact exist to preclude the entry of summary judgment in favor of Laidig Concrete.
FACTS
Randall Farr was employed by Family Builders, Inc. as a master carpenter. Family Builders primarily provided fram*1105ing for residences. Sometime in June 2000, a co-owner of Family Builders, Matthew Zimmer, contacted Matt Laidig, the owner of Laidig Concrete, about Family Builders using a boom truck owned…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Warner Trucking, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Moberly v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Progressive Construction & Engineering Co. v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hale v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Indianapolis v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017