Legal Opinion
Hale v. Kemp
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1991No. 82S01-9109-CV-743PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
This personal injury action presents issues regarding the claim of a casual employee that he falls outside the exclusivity provision of Indiana's worker's compensation laws both as to his employer and as to another for whom he was allegedly a "borrowed servant."
This action was commenced by Eugene Kemp and his wife Jennifer. Kemp was injured while working as an employee of George Tabor, who had told Kemp to help Lindsey W. Hale, proprietor of Hale Maintenance and Installation, in the erection of steel archways for Tabor. The present ac tion by Kemp seeks damages from George…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackie N. Beach and Julia M. Beach, Husband and Wife v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Fox v. Contract Beverage Packers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jackson Trucking Co. v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- New York Central Railroad v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Rensing v. Indiana State University Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Moberly v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Mortgage Consultants, Inc. v. MahaneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Degussa Corp. v. MullensIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Williams v. R.H. Marlin, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.