Legal Opinion
Martin v. Aboyan
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1983No. Civ. 68547PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
In this case we are asked to decide for the first time whether a homestead exemption must be protected by following the procedural provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 484.070, subdivision (a) 1 in prejudgment attachment proceedings.
On October 22, 1981, Sarbouhi Martin and Hamazasb Martin (the Martins), plaintiffs and respondents, filed a complaint for breach of contract against Hratch Aboyan and Marguerite Aboyan (the Aboyans), defendants and appellants. Shortly thereafter, the Martins filed an application for order for issuance of writ of possession (§ 484.010 et…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Southern Pacific Milling Co. v. MilliganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Becker v. LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vfs Financing, Inc. v. Chf Express, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Blastrac, N.A. v. Concrete Solutions & SupplyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Metric & Inch Tools, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Peck v. HagenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- California Physicians Service, Inc. v. HealthPlan Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.