Blastrac, N.A. v. Concrete Solutions & Supply
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT
SUZANNE H. SEGAL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 1, 2009, Plaintiff Blastrac, N.A. (“Blastrac”) filed a Complaint (“Complaint”) for breach of contract against Defendant Concrete Solutions & Supply (“CSS”). On November 4, 2009, CSS filed a First Amended Answer and Counterclaim (“Answer”) alleging that Blastrac had breached the parties’ contract and asserting affirmative defenses. On November 18, 2009, Blastrac filed an Application for a Right to Attach Order (“Application”); a Memorandum of Points…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kemp Bros. Construction v. Titan Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Loeb & Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Morris v. Belfor USA Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Waffer International Corp. v. KhorsandiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BuildSimHub Inc. v. Beijing Jianyi Investment Development (Group) Co. Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Feng Zhang v. Dahua Technology, USA, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022