Legal Opinion
State v. McMurphy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 22, 1980No. C 79-02-30644, CA 15503PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Defendant seeks reversal of his convictions for possession of a controlled substance (ORS 475.992), delivery of a controlled substance (ORS 475.992) and ex-convict in possession of a firearm (ORS 166.270). Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from the residence where he was arrested. We agree and reverse and remand.
On the evening of February 24, 1979, an undercover narcotics officer of the Portland Police Bureau met Jeffrey Woodward and Gary Gast at S.E. 39th and Holgate Streets in Portland to work out the details of a cocaine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McMurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HansonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990