Legal Opinion
State v. Olson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1979No. C 76-12-17439, DA 129621, CA 8276, SC 25891PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Defendant was charged with burglary in the first degree. His motion to quash evidence of items of personal property seized in his home as well as evidence of certain statements and a confession he made at the time of his arrest was allowed. The state appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s allowance of the motion. 34 Or App 511, 579 P2d 277 (1978). This court granted review.
There is no dispute of consequence about the facts. The complaining witness and his family left their home and went out to dinner about 6 p.m. When they returned at 8 p.m. they found their house had…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. FoskeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. AbneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.