Legal Opinion

Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. Hyde

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1968No. 40923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Carson Pirie Scott & Company brought action against John A. Hyde and his wife under the so-called Family Expense Act (section 15 of the Husband and Wife Act) to recover for goods purchased by the wife. The parties stipulated to the facts after which judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendant John A. Hyde appeals directly to this court, seeking to avoid liability on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional.

The Family Expense Act provides that “The expenses of the family and of the education of the children shall be chargeable upon the property of both husband and wife, or of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smedley v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Lawrence v. SinnamonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Hyman v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Myers v. FieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradaric v. Bradaric (In Re Bradaric)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. White v. NeelandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Lyman v. HarbaughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Central Illinois Light Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API