Legal Opinion

Barber v. Schmidt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2015No. 7026 S-15141/S-15152PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I.. INTRODUCTION

Six Alaska prisoners jointly filed a pro se putative class-action complaint against various Department of Corrections officials. Their complaint detailed 18 causes of action, many of which address changes in Department policy regarding inmate purchase and possession of gaming systems and restrictions on mature-rated video games.

One of the prisoners moved for class certification and for appointment of counsel. The superior court denied the class action motion on the grounds that pro se plaintiffs cannot represent a class, and denied the appointment of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Matter of K.L.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Patterson v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Junior Antenor, Keilan C. Ebli, and Loren J. Larson Jr. v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Patrick H. Torrence v. Tyler BlueAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API