Legal Opinion
Lazzaro v. Franklin Mint Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 1993No. 93-CV-1561PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This is an action filed by plaintiff, Joseph N. Lazzaro, for an alleged violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), by his former employer, the Franklin Mint Company. At issue before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant asserts that summary judgment is warranted in this ease because plaintiff has failed to set forth a prima facie ease of discrimination. Alternatively, defendant argues that even…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gutknecht v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Kelly v. Retirement Pension Plan for Certain Home Office, Managerial & Other Employees of Provident MutualDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002