Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Retirement Pension Plan for Certain Home Office, Managerial & Other Employees of Provident Mutual
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 11, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-1789PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Kelly (“Kelly”) brings various claims against his former employer,. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Provident”) and its retirement plan, the Retirement-Pension Plan for Certain Home Office, Managerial and Other Employees of Provident Mutual. Kjelly brings a claim for pension credit for certain years of service; a claim for disability retirement benefits; and claims of wrongful termination based on age, disability, common-law retaliation, and breach of implied contract. 1
After a bench trial, and upon…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broadwater v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Walsh v. Alarm Security Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Daniel McCray v. South Eastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026