Legal Opinion

Hade v. Nationwide Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1988No. 87 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDermott, justice.

Appellant, Nationwide Insurance Company, appeals from the order of the Superior Court, 349 Pa.Super. 541, 503 A.2d 980 which affirmed the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying appellant’s petition to vacate or modify an arbitration panel’s award of $300,000.00 entered against Nationwide and in favor of its insured, George Hade. This Court granted appellant’s petition for allowance of appeal on the limited issue of whether the arbitrators exceeded the scope of their authority in entering this award.

The relevant facts of this case are as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Pennsylvania General Insurance v. BarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Borgia v. Prudential Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Ginther v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Shapiro v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Jefferson Woodlands Partners, L.P. v. Jefferson Hills BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Mikkilineni v. Indiana County CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API