Legal Opinion

Sandifer Motors, Inc. v. City of Roeland Park

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 15, 1981No. 51,137PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foth, C.J.:

Plaintiff sued the City of Roeland Park for flood damage to its business sustained in September, 1975, by reason of a claimed nuisance maintained by the city on its adjoining property. The case was submitted to a jury on a theory of comparative negligence or comparative fault. The jury fixed plaintiff’s damages at $30,607.03, allocating the fault 30% to plaintiff, 50% to defendant city, and 20% to unknown third parties. The city appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict raising two primary issues: that the evidence did not support a finding of nuisance, and that the doctrine…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Denny v. GaravagliaMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Haysville U.S.D. No. 261 v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  4. Bolin v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. United Proteins, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API