Legal Opinion
Fogarty v. City of Chico
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 2007No. C052576PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
Plaintiffs Thomas V. and Mary Fogarty (in their capacity as the trustees of two trusts) appeal from a judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant City of Chico (City) and several individual defendants. They limit the scope of their appeal to a single count in their pleading against only defendant City. They, contend the superior court erred in its conclusion that this count is time-barred. We shall affirm. In so doing, we find that in this instance the applicable statute of limitations is codified in the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Guillemin v. SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bach v. McNelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Branciforte Heights, LLC v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ponderosa Homes, Inc. v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Fuller v. First Franklin Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lynch v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Sterling Park, L.P. v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Biagini v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.