Legal Opinion

Middlebrooks v. Lonas

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 5, 1980No. 36460PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Presiding Justice.

Mary Middlebrooks filed a complaint against W. L. Lonas and Elvira Lonas, her parents, alleging that, in reliance on their promise to repay, she had loaned them $25,000 which they had since used to build a home on land which they owned, that they now refused to repay said loan and that, “The above and foregoing transactions, promises, and delays constitute fraud and as such the defendants herein hold the said $25,000 through and by constructive and implied trust in favor of the plaintiff.” The plaintiff further alleged that, “The defendants herein have pledged,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillen v. BostickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Hayes v. Hallmark ApartmentsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Pittman v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Mutual Loan & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Vann v. DeKalb County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, MovantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Bowdish v. Johns Creek AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Higginbottom v. Thiele Kaolin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API