Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Gunn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1937No. Nos. 11818, 11838PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

Two individuals instituted an action to enjoin a railroad company from committing certain alleged acts of trespass on described lands of the plaintiffs. The defendant filed a demurrer to the petition as amended, and an answer. At interlocutory hearing the judge overruled the demurrer, and, after introduction of evidence, granted an injunction to preserve the status until the final trial. The defendant excepted.

1. The plaintiffs alleged that ownership of the lands was in virtue of the will of a testator and certain deeds, copies of which were set forth, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brigham v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Gray Lumber Co. v. GaskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Saint Amand v. LehmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Justices of the Inferior Court v. Griffin & West Point Plank Road Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cravey v. Southeastern Underwriters Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Vann v. DeKalb County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, MovantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Middlebrooks v. LonasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Moss v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API