Legal Opinion

Colonial Bank v. Marine Bank, N.A.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1989No. 88-1128PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Marine Bank (Marine) appeals, arguing that optional future advances made by a first mortgagee after acquiring actual knowledge of an intervening second mortgage are not entitled to priority over the second mortgage. We conclude that although mortgages to secure future advances are valid, optional advances made by a first mortgagee with actual knowledge of a second mortgage do not have priority over the second mortgage. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court.

The facts are stipulated. On September 26, 1977, Colonial Bank (Colonial) recorded a mortgage against the homestead of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Capocasa v. First National Bank of Stevens PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Allied Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Carter v. ReweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Wisconsin Planing Mill Co. v. SchudaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Barron v. GiesekeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. First Interstate Bank of Wisconsin-Southeast v. Heritage Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. In Re BeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API