Legal Opinion
Bank of Barron v. Gieseke
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 12, 1992No. 91-2527PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Lyle and Gladys Ufer and Robert and Lorraine Gieseke (collectively "the Ufers") appeal a judgment of foreclosure in favor of the Bank of Barron. The trial court found that Arthur and Ellen Gieseke's (the debtors) notes to Barron were secured by a 1979 Consumer Real Estate Security Agreement (CRESA) covering the debtors' real property, and, therefore, the notes had priority over the Ufers' 1986 mortgages in the debtors' real property. The Ufers argue that: (1) The trial court erred by finding that the CRESA was valid; (2) The CRESA does not apply to the notes that failed to specify that they…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borchardt v. WilkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. PlevaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Rock River Lumber Corp. v. Universal Mortgage Corp. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State Bank of Hartland v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- John Miller Supply Co. v. Western State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- First Bank & Trust v. Firstar Information Services, Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Craigs, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- AVL Powertrain Engineering, Inc. v. Fairbanks Morse EngineDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Town of Neenah Sanitary District No. 2 v. City of NeenahCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- PNC Bank, N.A. v. HoornaarDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.