Legal Opinion

Capocasa v. First National Bank of Stevens Point

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1967PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The mortgage executed in June of 1963 by the Capocasas provided not only that the property serve as security for the present consideration of *719$10,600, but also for any “further sums of money which may be or become owing” to the bank. There is no doubt that mortgages to secure future advances serve a socially and economically desirable purpose.1

Wisconsin has long recognized that a mortgage can secure future advances and the lien of the mortgage will attach at the time of the mortgage even though the advances are made at a later date. Carter v. Rewey (1885), 62 Wis. 552, 22 N. W. 129; Wisconsin…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beavers v. LeSueurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. First v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Berger v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Wood v. Parker Square State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Carter v. ReweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Bank of Hartland v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  2. John Miller Supply Co. v. Western State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mitchell Bank v. SchankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Everett Credit Union v. Allied Ambulance Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Wong v. Beneficial Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API