Legal Opinion
Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. v. Village of Fox Lake
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 12, 1999No. 97 C 8023PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
In an earlier opinion, PrimeCo Personal Communications, L.P. v. Village of Fox Lake, 26 F.Supp.2d 1052 (N.D.Ill.1998) (“Pn- meCo I ”), this Court held that the Village’s decision denying PrimeCo’s application for a special use permit violated the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iii). We remanded the case to the local zoning authority, instructing it to either grant PrimeCo’s permit application or conduct an expedited hearing in conformity with our opinion. The Village Trustees chose the latter option, conducted a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Constance BREWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- At & T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. v. Orange CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
- Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. v. Village of Fox LakeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. City of Elkhart Board of Zoning AppealsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
- New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999