New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
733 A.2d 442 (1999)
160 N.J. 1
NEW BRUNSWICK CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, d/b/a Comcast Cellular One, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Respondent, and
Ted Dabrowski, Kaz Dabrowski, Karl Kolar, Sally Kolar, Vincent J. Dotoli and Louisa Dotoli, Intervenors-Respondents.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 3, 1999.
Decided June 30, 1999.
Gregory J. Czura, Ringwood, for plaintiff-appellant.
James F. Clarkin, III, N. Brunswick, for defendant-respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman, Stahl & Clarkin, attorneys; Mr. Clarkin and Rosalind Westlake,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.