Legal Opinion

New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 30, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

733 A.2d 442 (1999)

160 N.J. 1

NEW BRUNSWICK CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, d/b/a Comcast Cellular One, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Respondent, and

Ted Dabrowski, Kaz Dabrowski, Karl Kolar, Sally Kolar, Vincent J. Dotoli and Louisa Dotoli, Intervenors-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 3, 1999.

Decided June 30, 1999.

Gregory J. Czura, Ringwood, for plaintiff-appellant.

James F. Clarkin, III, N. Brunswick, for defendant-respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman, Stahl & Clarkin, attorneys; Mr. Clarkin and Rosalind Westlake,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  5. Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API