Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Bolieau
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 11, 1984No. 82-528PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
Plaintiffs appeal an adverse judgment from the District Court of Vermont, Unit No. 2, Chittenden Circuit, in their action to apportion among the defendants their pro rata share of costs for the maintenance of a common roadway. We reverse.
Plaintiffs, owners of the Oak Hill Mobile Home Development, located in Williston, Vermont, are successors in interest to Howard Sr. and Barbara A. Hubbard. Between 1960 and 1975, the senior Hubbards sold 46 of the development’s lots to various individuals. In conjunction with these conveyances, the senior Hubbards granted easements over the roads appurtenant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Black River Associates, Inc. v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- R. Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Credit Alliance CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Kelly v. Alpstetten Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Sanborn v. BraleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
- Thomas v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Birchwood Land Company, Inc. v. KrizanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Alpine Haven Property Owners Ass'n v. DeptulaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- John Moyers v. Sheun Lai Poon and Brenda Lee PoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- Sarita & Nafis Khan, Eric & Katherine Gadpaille, Judith LaPointe & Robert Earley v. Alpine Haven Property Owners' Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Sarita and Nafis Khan, Eric and Katherine Gadpaille, Judith LaPointe and Robert Earley v. Alpine Haven Property Owners' Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.