Legal Opinion

Black River Associates, Inc. v. Koehler

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 1967No. 1079PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.

The court of chancery for Rutland County has ordered specific performance to enforce the plaintiff’s contract to purchase land in the towns of Shrewsbury and Mt. Holly, formerly owned by the defendants Lorenz and Fanny Koehler. While the plaintiff’s contract was pending, the Koehlers conveyed the property to the defendant Dion. The decree includes a declaration that the deed from the Koehlers to Dion is null and void and orders that instrument set aside. The defendants Koehler are directed to convey the premises to the plaintiff. Without participation by his co-defendants, Dion appeals. He…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Westpark, Inc. v. Seaton Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Wilkins v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  4. Canfield v. HardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  5. Vermont Marble Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tallarico v. BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  2. Myers v. LaCasseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Field v. CostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. In Re Eastland, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Adams v. B & D Builders & Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API