Legal Opinion

Kornfuehrer v. Philadelphia Bindery, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1965No. 4-64-Civ. 241PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, District Judge.

This action is now before the Court on a motion by the defendant to quash the service of process and dismiss the action.

Plaintiff Heinz Kornfuehrer is a resident of Minnesota. The defendant Philadelphia Bindery, Inc., (Bindery), is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia.

Early in February, 1963, Kornfuehrer wrote the Bindery to ask if it manufactured spring back binders. A series of letters followed in which the parties discussed specifications and terms. For the purposes of this opinion, it may be assumed that in late March…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  4. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vencedor Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Gougler Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Electro-Craft Corporation v. Maxwell Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. McQuay, Inc. v. Samuel Schlosberg, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
  4. Roland v. Modell's Shoppers World of Bergen Cty.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API