Electro-Craft Corporation v. Maxwell Electronics Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises the familiar problem of in personam jurisdiction, by substituted service, over a foreign corporation. The District Court denied the defendant’s motion to quash service of process and to dismiss. We affirm.
The plaintiff, Electro-Craft Corporation, is a Minnesota corporation engaged in the manufacture of small motors and military radio communications’ equipment. The defendant, Maxwell Electronics Corporation, is a Texas corporation engaged in the manufacture of receiver-transmitters. On June 25, 1964, the plaintiff wrote to the defendant and stated that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Scullin Steel Company v. National Railway Utilization Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Mountaire Feeds, Inc. v. Agro Impex, S. A., a Panamanian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Block Industries, a Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.