Legal Opinion
McQuay, Inc. v. Samuel Schlosberg, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 19, 1971No. 4-70 Civ. 327PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Minnesota based manufacturing corporation, in bringing this diversity action has attempted to effect service of process upon the defendant, a New York corporation, under the Minnesota long-arm statutes, Minn.Stat. §§ 303.13 Subd. 1(3) and 543.19 Subd. 1. Defendant is a heating and air conditioning contractor with its principal and only office and place of business in New York City. It is one of plaintiff’s customers. The only connection it has or has had with the State of Minnesota is that it submitted a purchase order to plaintiff to buy some of its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Scullin Steel Company v. National Railway Utilization Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Mountaire Feeds, Inc. v. Agro Impex, S. A., a Panamanian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Whittaker Corporation v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.