Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Henning
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopicins, J.
The plaintiff moves to strike out certain defenses contained in the answers of the defendants on the ground that they are insufficient in law (Bules Civ. Prac., rule 109). Though the notice of motion does not specify whether one or both of the answers are challenged, the motion has been treated as addressed to both, and the parties in their briefs have so treated the motion.
*872The action is brought for a declaratory judgment adjudicating the interest of the plaintiff in certain premises and the proceeds received therefrom as a result of a sale, rental, or leasing thereof, to compel the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lightfoot v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Dodds v. McColganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Flynn v. Royal Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Safrin v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. KirschenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Walsh v. RechlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Walsh v. HenningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Aspesi v. Shahinian Acoustics, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981