Legal Opinion
Safrin v. Friedman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge J. Beloock, J.
Defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint under rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice solely upon the ground that the alleged causes of action are barred by a two-year Statute of Limitations provided in the so-called Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 255).
There are two causes of action set forth in the amended complaint. The first is for unpaid overtime compensation, together with liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees, as provided by statute. The second is for unpaid overtime compensation pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between an employees’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feinberg v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Clarke v. GilmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Conklin v. . FurmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Feinberg v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Press v. DraperNew York Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Robinson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- State v. Solil Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1985
- Government of India v. Cargill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.