Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Kirschenbaum
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
The defendants Atlantic Funeral Service, Inc., and Kirschenbaum Brothers, Inc., jointly move to dismiss the complaint herein upon the following grounds: (a) That it is legally insufficient; (b) that the court should decline to accept jurisdiction and to pronounce a declaratory judgment with regard to the alleged controversy described in the complaint for reasons indicated; (c) that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action; and (d) for such other and further relief as may seem just and proper. The individual defendant likewise moves to dismiss the complaint for legal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. HameraNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Flynn v. Royal Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Sterling Stewart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Sterling Stewart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Physical Culture Hotel, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York Casualty Co. v. BarbieriNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Ganas v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Walsh v. HenningNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. LipskyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Allstate Insurance v. De CesareNew York Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.