Hogan v. State

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

In three related issues, appellant John Dan Hogan appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). 1 He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence that the police obtained after arresting him. We affirm.

Background Facts

On an early fall morning in 2008, Fort Worth Police Department Officer C.D. Harris was on patrol when he heard another officer, who was on a bike, say on the radio that a car was driving dangerously and going the wrong way on a one-way street. Officer Harris found a car that matched the…