Luckenbach v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
Appellant Lance Mitchell Luckenbach challenges his conviction for driving while intoxicated, arguing in a single issue that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence of blood-alcohol-concentration tests conducted under a search warrant because the warrant’s supporting affidavit did not show probable cause. Concluding the affidavit supports a finding of probable cause and the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to suppress, we affirm.
I. Background
After appellant was charged with driving while intoxicated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Swain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- State v. McLainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Rothstein v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Justin William Hardy v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
- MacK Curtis Ivory v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2023
- Myron Earl Canady v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
- Quentin Earl Edwards v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
- The State of Texas v. Quoc Huynh, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2023