Legal Opinion

Tobey v. Randall

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1919No. Civ. No. 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In the briefs of counsel for appellant we are informed that this is an action to compel specific performance of a contract, and that the appeal is from a judgment. entered after an order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint, without leave to amend. The opening brief contains a statement that the second amended complaint “alleges in summary” certain facts concerning transactions between plaintiff and defendant. But the learned writers do not favor us with even a summary statement of the contents of the demurrer which was so fatal to their third attempt to state a cause of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Scott v. Hollywood Park Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chandlee v. McCallaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Magee v. W. J. Burt Motor Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noyes v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API