Legal Opinion

Chmiel v. Yatsko

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 13, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This is the appeal of the defendant below from plaintiff’s judgment, rendered by the District Court, sitting without a jury, for $220 which later, on a rule to show cause why the damages should not be reduced, was reduced to $200.

The complaint alleged in the first count that “* * * the defendant willfully and maliciously fed or caused to be fed poison to the pigeons with the intent to injure the same;” and in the second count thereof that “* * * the defendant willfully and maliciously and without just cause, caused certain corn to be…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Canonico v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Killeen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Kazanjian v. Atlas Novelty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. State v. CestoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Hardt v. Heller Bros.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API