Legal Opinion

State v. Cestone

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 21, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

38 N.J. Super. 139 (1955)

118 A.2d 416

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RALPH R. CESTONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 31, 1955.

Decided November 21, 1955.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. George Warren argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Italo M. Tarantola, attorney; Messrs. Warren & Stein, of counsel).

Mr. Herbert T. Heisel, Jr., Prosecutor of Hunterdon County, argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The present defendant feels sufficiently aggrieved to prosecute an appeal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. DantonioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. State v. ClevelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Hill v. Borough of CollingswoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. State v. YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yoerg v. Northern New Jersey Mtg. AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Rivera v. GrillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. State v. MassaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. State v. WenzelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. State v. BookbinderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API