In re: David C. Welsh and Sharon N. Welsh
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PERRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this chapter 132 case, the bankruptcy court confirmed a chapter 13 plan under which debtors David and Sharon Welsh (“debtors”) proposed to retain and continue to make payments on six vehicle loans and that did not take into account monthly Social Security income. The chapter 13 trustee appeals the order confirming the plan, arguing that the bankruptcy court should have considered both the payments on what he characterizes as unnecessary vehicles and the Social Security income in determining whether the plan was proposed in good faith.
Because we conclude that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re AlexanderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- In Re Farrar-JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Meyer v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Anderson v. Cranmer (In Re Cranmer)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- In Re: DAVID C. WELSH and SHARON N. WELSHCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- In re: Christopher Michael Marino and Valerie Margaret MarinoUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Meyer v. Lepe (In Re Lepe)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Danielson v. Flores (In Re Flores)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.