D'Alessandro v. Pickford
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. A motion for a nonsuit was granted and the plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
The appellant, having a written lease, operated a barber shop and beauty parlor in a building owned by the respondent. The respondent held two chattel mortgages on the equipment used in this business, which had been given by the appellant on separate occasions as security for unpaid rent and money loaned. Thereafter, on March 2, 1934, the respondent brought suit in a justice’s court for $460 for unpaid rent which had subsequently accrued. In pursuance of a writ of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Porter v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Anchester v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Ferguson v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Paskle v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Stanley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Williams v. CoombsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- E. I. Noxon Construction Co. v. Wallace Process Piping Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.