Porter v. Brooks
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Crockett, J.:
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dissolve an attachment. The action is founded, in part, on a promissory note, and partly on a small book account. The defendant moved to dissolve the attachment on the ground that, after action brought, he had tendered to the plaintiff and his attorneys payment of the book account, which tenr der was refused; and he avers his readiness to pay at any time. In respect to the promissory note, he avers that the consideration of it was the following, to wit: That he procured from the plaintiff a conveyance for an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hill v. GrigsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blankenship v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Largey v. ChapmanMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- United States of Mexico v. RaskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bowman v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Hinkel v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.