Legal Opinion

Schobert v. Inter-County Drainage Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1955No. Calendar 46,307PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiffs herein are farmers in the county of Tuscola. They have filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the defendant, Inter-County Drainage Board of Tuscola, Sanilac and Lapeer counties for the "White Creek No 2 Inter-County Drain. It was the complaint of the plaintiffs that the defendant board caused the construction of an inter-county drain which crossed their farms. Having done so, and having thus severed plaintiffs’ farms into “disconnected portions,” the defendant board found itself without funds for the construction of suitable bridges or passageways across the drains. As a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Betts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Continental Distilling Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Groesbeck v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CoutuMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Community Treatment Centers, Inc. v. City of WestlandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Mount Clemens Harness Ass'n v. Racing CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Williams v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API