Legal Opinion

Milton Orozco-Velasquez v. Attorney General United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 11, 2016No. 13-1685PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

In this petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), we must determine the specificity required in a “notice to appear” (NTA), summoning an alien to appear before an Immigration Judge (IJ) for removal proceedings. By statute, an NTA must specify “[t]he time and place at which the proceedings will be held.” 1 The issue before us is whether a notice that lacks such specificity is effective. The BIA has held that service of an NTA, which did not contain' these statutory requirements, discontinued an alien’s residency period for purposes…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Mario Ortiz-Santiago v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ and CAPULA-CORTESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  4. Isaias Lorenzo Lopez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Banuelos-Galviz v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API