Legal Opinion

People v. Helm

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. Crim. No. 1398PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Defendant was informed against by the district attorney of the county of Fresno for the crime of murder, was tried and found guilty of murder in the first degree. He moved for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, his motions were denied, and the judgment was pronounced, imposing the death penalty. From the judgment and order denying his motion for. a new trial he prosecutes this appeal.

The defendant, with his brother, was accused of murdering a farmer and his wife who were camped by a roadside in the county of Fresno, shooting them both with a shotgun. The apparent motive of the crime was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Lombardi v. California Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Holt v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People v. NogiriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. MickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. BittakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API