Legal Opinion

Chicago Transit Authority v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1992No. 1-91-4085 WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rakowski

The employer, Chicago Transit Authority, appeals the circuit court’s confirmation of the Industrial Commission’s (Commission’s) decision which held that claimant Joshua Chism was injured in the course of his employment and awarded benefits to claimant. We affirm.

The pertinent facts follow. Claimant, age 27, testified that he was employed as a bus driver for the employer in 1984. Prior to working for the employer, claimant, who had played basketball at Southern Illinois University for four years, played basketball at King Boys Club. On one occasion, claimant was approached by Arliss Jones, who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Dette v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kozak v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Cary Fire Protection District v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Law Offices of William W. Schooley v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells v. EnloeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Pickett v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Chicago Transit Authority v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Pickett v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Pinckneyville Community Hospital v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API