Law Offices of William W. Schooley v. Industrial Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward
Respondent (employer), Law Offices of William W. Schooley, appeals from a judgment of the trial court setting aside the Industrial Commission’s denial of benefits to the claimant, John Schooley (hereinafter John). The employer contends on appeal that John’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment within the meaning of section 11 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 48, par. 138.11).
John had worked for about seven years as a law clerk for his father’s law firm. Generally, his duties included investigation, research, and providing transportation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Certi-Serve, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Keystone Steel & Wire Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Fischer v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. DownsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Cary Fire Protection District v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Chicago Transit Authority v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Pickett v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Pryor v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.