Legal Opinion

Rangel-Perez v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2016No. 14-9566PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Fabian Rangel-Perez challenges the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) characterization of his Utah misdemeanor conviction as an “aggravated felony” under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). The BIA concluded that Rangel-Perez’s Utah conviction for unlawful sexual activity with a minor fell within the INA’s category of “aggravated” felonies that includes “sexual abuse of a minor” offenses. Rangel-Perez, contends that his prior Utah conviction is not an “aggravated felony” under the INA because the INA’s generic '“sexual abuse of a minor” offense…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Flores-Molina v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Nordahl v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Nelida Cabeda v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Lujan-Jimenez v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API