Legal Opinion
Flores-Molina v. Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 7, 2017No. 16-9516PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
Francisco Flores-Molina is an undocumented alien subject to removal from the United States. An immigration judge determined' he is ineligible for cancellation of removal because he has been convicted of a “crime involving moral turpitude.” The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed and dismissed Mr. Flores-Molina’s appeal. Mr. Flores-Molina then filed a petition in this court, arguing the Board of Immigration Appeals erred in finding that his crime of conviction, Denver Municipal Code § 38-40, is a crime involving moral turpitude. We agree. Exercising jurisdiction under 8…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- High Desert Relief, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Lucio-Rayos v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Green Solution Retail, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.