Central Soya Co., Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to compel Defendant to produce certain documents. Defendant opposes the production of said documents on grounds of attorney-client privilege and acquiescence. 1 Plaintiff asserts that Defend ant has waived any right to said privilege by previously producing two of 41 documents of the category involved. As to Plaintiffs claim of waiver, Defendant appears to deny a waiver but claims a waiver limited only to legal opinions if there is a waiver.
This Court has held the patent involved herein to be valid and infringed…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- United States v. RoundtreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Motor Wheel Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
- JJK Mineral Co., LLC v. SwigerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2013
- United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986