Legal Opinion
Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Motor Wheel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 25, 1991No. 5:90 CV 36PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROWLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Motor Wheel Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion To Compel Production Of Privileged Documents filed March 14, 1991. Kelsey-Hayes Company (“Plaintiff’) filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion. Defendant’s motion is granted as modified by this Court’s order.
Defendant has charged Kelsey-Hayes Corporation (“Plaintiff’) with willful and deliberate infringement of the 4,610,482 patent in suit. Plaintiff has produced the opinion of counsel, Vincent Barker, in a letter dated April 19,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- Rolls-Royce Limited and Renishaw, Plc v. Gte Valeron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Katz v. AT & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- Greene, Tweed of Delaware, Inc. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Dunhall Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Discus Dental, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.