Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Progulske

This is an action of contract against three individual Defendants who signed a series of promissory notes. Count No. 1 sued the defendants as endorsers, Count No. 2 sued them as makers, and Count No. 3 sued them as guarantors.

*195The defendants answered by general denial and by failure of consideration of the said notes, and that the plaintiff failed to give proper notice -to the defendants of the makers’ default on the payment of said note.

The evidence showed the following:

Cutler Hammer, Inc. was the manufacturer of electrical controls. Dix Electrical Supply Corporation, not a party to this…