Legal Opinion

Spare v. Glens Falls Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 11, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover on a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant on their house in Bristol. Damage was claimed to have been sustained by fire when an oil-burning furnace in the cellar of the house became overheated on January 22, 1946. The defendant denied liability on the ground that any fire which caused damage to the plaintiffs was a friendly fire, i. e., a fire not embraced within the terms of the policy. The court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed.

We summarize the material facts, which, except in the respect stated in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance Co. v. NamanTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. American Towing Co. v. German Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. Lavitt v. Hartford County Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. McGraw v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Gibbons v. German Insurance & Savings InstitutionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barcalo Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Consoli v. COMMONWEALTH INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  3. First Christian Church v. Hartford Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Consoli v. COMMONWEALTH INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API